Had dinner with the Ice-Cream Gang and it was lovely. We were basically a family unit headed by the sane parental figures and then the other slightly deranged baby-children who flounced around singing.
Anyway. The Hunger Games hype. Why. Why. Can I go through any website without being assaulted by Hunger Games fandom Thing is, I’ve read the books. I DON’T LIKE IT. AT ALL. It’s not that I have a problem with people not sharing my opinion, but – yes actually I do. PEOPLE, WHY. WHAT. I DON’T GET IT. THE HUNGER GAMES, REALLY? I was fine with people liking it, but the whole excitement over it just as the movie’s coming out and everyone’s posting photos of themselves with the book as if they’ve read it and it’s getting.. pretty.. annoying. I predict that a few years down it’s gonna be another Twilight (because it’s Twilight standards. It is.) where people get over it’s fancy-shmancy glitz action and start to see it for what it really is: another Twilight.
Why I Don’t Like The Hunger Games
#1: Expectations.
So maybe this isn’t much of the novel’s fault, but given it’s name and slight prior introduction, I was expecting something highly psychological. Not where people actually have to run around with arrows fighting for food, but something much more nuanced. Yes there can be bloodshed, action, and all. But The Hunger Games simplifies it down to gimmicks and hero-complexes, which makes up reasons #3 and 4.
#2: You can find books of this theme of WAY higher caliber. KINDLY REDIRECT HYPE.
a) Lord of the FLIES. Mind-blowing take on the psychological toll of CHILDREN fighting for survival. Completely realistic setting. AND THE ACTION? It COMES ALIVE. If you’ve read Hunger Games but not Lord of the Flies, PLEASE read Lord of the Flies and see if you can still stomach Hunger Games (haha. haha. stomach..)
b) Nothomb’s Sulfuric Acid. Another brilliant one. Slightly more surreal and less survival-fight-ish. It’s set in an unknown time period where people are likewise part of a TV reality program in a concentration camp where they were constantly tortured and essentially stripped of human rights. Their battle was largely cognitive, with lengthy asides of human nature, but it’s still a lot better than the artificial rubbish they tried to throw at me in the Hunger Games.
c) Battle Royale. Which the Hunger Games basically ripped off.
#3: Crap characterization.
I cannot emphasize this enough. This is Twilight, Maximum Ride, and all other teenage nonsense all over again. The characters all possess some sort of idealized hero-complex. Yes they all have flaws, but perfectly constructed flaws that are just there to facilitate the story. They aren’t human. Katniss: I LOVE MY SISTER SO MUCH. I NEED TO SACRIFICE FOR HER AND MY FAMILY. TAKE ME! I AM STRONG. I DON’T HAVE THE CHOICE TO DIE, ETC. Peeta: I LOVE KATNISS. THIS IS MY TRAIT. NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS OR WHAT I SEEM TO BE DOING IT IS TO REAFFIRM MY LOVE FOR KATNISS. Hero-complex. And then there’s that elfish girl there to beef up Katniss’ hero even further. And the very painfully obvious group of antagonists.
After reading Natsuo Kirino, I don’t believe in heros anymore. He writes about the human nature and it’s inherent failings so beautifully, so truthfully, that anything that even tries to discount this truthfulness makes me want to hurl. The Hunger Games simplifies human so much, that if it were a dimension in Flatland, it wouldn’t even be that one-dimensional line. It would be the singular point that looks exactly the same from all angles.
#4: FANCY-SHMANCY GLITZY-GLAM NONSENSE.
Seriously. The sympathetic and fashionable stylists, the plastic-looking flamboyant hosts, her chariot is ON FIRE!!! SO IS HER COSTUME!!! CROWDS! CHEERS! HUGE PLASMA SCREEN AND PODS AND AN ARENA AND NATURE WHERE YOU GET TO MOVE AROUND LIKE AN ATHLETE (a la Twilight)! I don’t know. Over-usage of visual gimmicks is sometimes forgivable, but when it’s also CLICHED? No. The whole impressive scenery thing works only n Harry Potter where everything is TOO ORIGINAL TO DISLIKE. Points for creativity.
Everything on The Hunger Games though, are vaguely things we’ve picked up from the very basic fancy stage tricks we’ve seen all our lives. It just. Didn’t impress. I mean at all. I might have cringed while reading because it tried so hard to be fancy and grand but just came off common and base. It’s as if someone wrote it knowing it’ll make for a great movie (it probably does make an appropriate action blockbuster)(it kind of IS one now) and I hate it when people do that. We have an imagination. Stop writing for it to be filmed.
#5: Seriously, the romance?
Peeta. The fat baker. NO. Much as I didn’t like the novel, it had one redeeming quality. GALE. Who is basically the only tolerable character in the book. But no. There had to be a completely idealized, thoroughly maudlin, very TRAGIC and NOBLE love story which is ironically eagerly craved by the dumb Capitol which I find absolutely HILARIOUS given the whole PeeNiss fandom in reality. SATIRE, PEOPLE. DO YOU NOT SEE IT? Probably not, I doubt it’s even intended. It is like Coffeeshop Romance but ten times worst because Peeta is so ridiculously and inexplicably willing to sacrifice himself for Katniss. He is nothing as a character but a romantic hero. The bile rises…
#6: The faux-political theme.
WHY DO THEY EVEN TRY. It’s like they try to mash up all the possible popular themes to churn out a best-seller. Sometimes you just. don’t. attempt too many themes when you can’t even handle basic characterization properly. The faux-politics is laughable. The faceless Capitol, the brief introduction of how exactly Panem landed in that state (which I found unbelievable and thus un-frightening), the post-apocalyptic mess. The only thing I semi-liked about it is how every district had it’s own signature, and in varying degrees of wealthiness. But then again it’s a cheap, clever trick that any dystopian author with a brainwave could achieve.
Brave New World, 1984 and Iron Heel gave me a pervasively insidious feeling when I read it – speculative-political fiction should do that; make you somehow fear that it is possible no matter how absurd the setting. I don’t see Panem coming true any time. Logistically and logically, it doesn’t work. Once again, it doesn’t hit home.
#7: The plot itself…
Just gave me a million opportunities to go Please lah, you really want me to see this as plausible. It being a post-apocalyptic, fantasy type novel, of course you can’t expect it to be grounded in current day reality. What I mean is the way in which people respond to things, how characters carry out things, how things they do work out. It’s all just too… pretty. Yes the death and the bloodshed, but everything’s so calculated, predictable, meant to be, just so the story will the take the shape readers would like. Just the right amount of tears and adrenaline and happiness and everything.
I guess if you’re looking for feel-good and predictable, The Hunger Games would be an appropriate choice. If you’ve read too much ugly and truth to be drawn into another blockbuster novel, skip it.







by God, HER FEARFUL SYMMETRY. guilt wants me to tell you i picked this one out purely because its title is so sublime. so on the cover we have the Hilton sisters decked out in the hot threads of Christmas ’99. despite that, instincts tell me it’ll be good. twins unnaturally codependent (i love weird twin stories), neighbor with OCD, gothic house and the cemetery (symmetry.. geddit?). i’m very excited about this. although i wish i got the plain cover instead of the Christmas Hilton ’99 one for selfish aesthetic reasons.
