Q

  • About
  • Q Writes
  • Q Scribbles
  • Archival

  • A response to Janelle Lee (‘s fans)

    Just read Janelle Lee’s open letter to the education minister.

    Frankly, I am not impressed. I’d applaud her for taking the time to comment on an issue that bugs her (especially at a time so close to her Os), and agree that her points are somewhat valid. But other than that?

    I was expecting some insight, a fresh perspective, at least a critical suggestion addressing the situation. Instead, I rifted through points that were done to death on TV, in online forums, and across the dinner table. Have we not already explored the rigidity, the textbook-based system, the lack of creativity in Singaporean classrooms?

    If I isolate her content and credit style for the apparent effectiveness of the letter, it is similarly disappointing. At best, Janelle is polite. She is fluent and clear. But stylistically, it is empty and somewhat aimless. I know (think?) she feels strongly for the subject, but the passion, the concern, even the interest wasn’t conveyed prettily enough/at all to properly engage a critical reader (and by that I mean one who is thinking not one who is bitchy). Basically she doesn’t have a strong individual voice.

    I have nothing against Janelle’s hopes and ideas, but I do have something to say about the uproar surrounding it. If I hadn’t read the comments, I would’ve just gone ‘oh, nice effort!’ and moved on with my life. Everything I’ve said is not a criticism of Janelle per se, because I had no prior expectations of her, and Janelle did not really pride herself for being some sort of great journalistic political matyr or anything. It was the comments that made her seem like so. In this light, should she really be credited for her ‘observations’, ‘maturity’ and ‘ability to question the unquestioned’?

    She did make observations – passive ones, and furthermore ones that did not require much analysis of the situation. In fact, they are conventional views – listen and you’ll hear the multitudes, from the elites to the lower rungs, bitching about the system.

    Yes she is mature, not in her views and thoughts, but that she channeled her frustrations in a classy manner.

    I’d have to disagree that she ‘questions the unquestioned’. That is untrue, because everything she has questioned had been questioned so many damn times they have become a tedium than something of intellectual wonder.

    These are my suspicions. Readers continue to laud her brilliant writing and maturity because by themselves, they have
    a) No pre-understanding of the discussions on the issue of education. They are probably hermits who’ve newly emerged from deep hibernation since the autocratic times. The presence of dissent, and moreover dissent that they can identify with, sends then into frantic flights of eager admiration.

    b) Not given much thought to the issue.
    ‘WOW. I am impressed!!! So cool! I have never thought about education this way! In fact, I have never thought of education, ever! Actually I’ve never thought, period.’ (okay idk why I’m morphing into such a bitch tart here SRS! I promise this is a friendly benign observation I think I’m just cranky it’s past my bedtime.)

    c) The tendency to underestimate youths. Judging from the comments, I think this might be the most pertinent reason of all for the Janelle Lee letter worship. Many are along the line of ‘FOR SUCH A YOUNG AGE, YOU (insert niceties here).’ The temasek review titles it ‘an open letter to the minister BY A SECONDARY FOUR STUDENT.’ Now why the emphasis on her age? If she were a thirty year old businessman, will the letter still be considered ‘impressive’? Would you endorse a kindergarden child’s letter of little sense just because he could spell everything correctly?

    People give her more credit than she truly deserves, or may have even exaggerated the true brilliance of her letter because they viewed her age as an intellectual handicap.

    The truth: on the Internet, or on any other technological device, youths have a combined intelligence about ten times as powerful as adults (given that the population size of both are equal).

    The interwebz are where teenagers and yuppies THRIVE. We’re given a powerful platform that almost forces us to come up with the freshest insights at the fastest speed possible. Most who use the Internet at an impressionable age go through an intellectual rebirth. That is sadly, the privilege of the young. Many competent adults sound like complete retards on the Internet.

    My point is, online, youths are the geniuses. Flashes of genius stun adults who otherwise face seeming inert apathy of teens in real life. What may have been the daily online exercise of these teenagers impress them a lot more than it should.

    This is what happened, I believe, in the case of Janelle Lee. Now that I’m nearing sleep and on the whole a happier person, I’ll say for a Sec 4 she’s quite a steady thinker. Not the most eloquent, not the most analytical, but still a notch higher than the majority of our youths.

    I’m really glad Singaporean teens deposit coherent take on issues that matter, a significant progression from listing what they had for dinner (curry rice and tauhuey jsyk). So yeah. Good for her.

    Of all, people should start setting higher standards for the critical skills of students. If you don’t trust us enough to form our own judgement on things – even displaying deep surprise at a simple, somewhat mediocre, show of political judgment – it stifles our ability to think because in return we conform to the expectations you have of us.

    THATSALLKTHNXBYE. DON’T HATE I AM SLEEPY AS HELL.

    OH YES. For those of you who went through the above without an inkling of what the hell I’m writing about, here’s Janelle Lee’s open letter to the education minister (Mr Heng Swee Keat) where she points out the flaws of the education system:

    http://www.temasekreview.com/2011/07/12/an-open-letter-to-the-education-minister-from-a-secondary-4-student/

    July 22, 2011

  • because we be harry potter geeks

     

    July 16, 2011

  • i’nsane.

    BLOCKS. ARE. OVER.

    it was altogether such a terrifying experience there wasn’t much relief yesterday when it we were finally done with it. events after – lunch at ichiban-boshi, drugged out shopping, and scaling up the orchard central, was BIZARRE. plain bizarre. we saw colored men in bodysuits trying to drink (and failing because, well duh they were wearing FREAKING BODYSUITS). there was also apparently a cosplay fest we were uninformed of in our stint of reclusion, which was frankly quite scary, and then the star wars troopers and chewbacca and for some reason, sharity elephant, were leading a dragon-dance. i have no idea what happened, really. but anyway.

    all i’m gonna do now is read. and read. and read. and eat. and watch billy elliot. also i’ll find some time to update more nonsense here.

    challenge of the week: read 30 novels. because PRELIMSPRELIMSPRELIMS then As! here soon and i won’t find time anymoar arghswisshawahah i’m going mad.

    July 3, 2011

  • going-ons

    1.

    tori-go has REALLY GOOD CHICKEN. or i’m just hungry, either.

    2.

    today, i wrote thirty sides. econs and history. i died. my arm is dead.

    3.

    BUY CHILE GRAPES. they are nice and juicy and of general awesomity because Chile had the volcanic explosion and my sister says the lava makes for great fertilisers. God, although i will be sad for the people who died in this explosion (where there any?), thank you for nice grapes.

    4.

    also, i love katjes. yogurt berries.

    5.

    MASTERCHEF IS THE BEST SHOW EVER. RIGHT NOW AT LEAST.

    6.

    of the last 5 updates, 4 were about food.

    7.

    Channel 8 has this new show and i wanna watch it i wanna watch it it has zoe tay but i need to

    8.

    purge my playlist of azure ray because i downloaded three albums based on a couple of their nicer songs AND THEY ARE ANNOYING ON MY iPOD.

    9.

    and then i will download patience and prudence THEY ARE SO AMAZING.

    10.

    I FINISHED MY CHILEAN GRAPES. sad life is sad kbye.

    June 28, 2011

  • so during the lit paper

    Snow

    The room was suddenly rich and the great bay-window was
    Spawning snow and pink roses against it
    Soundlessly collateral and incompatible:
    World is suddener than we fancy it.

    World is crazier and more of it than we think,
    Incorrigibly plural. I peel and portion
    A tangerine and spit the pips and feel
    The drunkenness of things being various.

    And the fire flames with a bubbling sound for world
    Is more spiteful and gay than one supposes–
    On the tongue on the eyes on the ears in the palms of your hands–
    There is more than glass between the snow and the huge roses.

    – Louis Macneice

    June 27, 2011

  • ‘I too have fallen.’

    “If there is no love in the world, we will make a new world, and we will give it walls, and we will furnish it with soft, red interiors, from the inside out, and give it a knocker that resonates like a diamond falling to a jeweller’s felt so that we should never hear it.

    Love me, because love doesn’t exist, and I have tried everything that does.”

    Read Everything is Illuminated, if not only for the story between Brod and her adoptive father Yankel. It was more than brutally truthful – it was the Truth, and it’s a beautiful one.

    June 24, 2011

  • What we are actually hating.

    the one thing about us humans is that we are all, inadvertently, selfish. this does not refer only to the motive behind malicious actions, but even those that appear altruistic.

    it’s like this: even when we truly, wholly want to do good – and a large part of us does it for the benefit of others – the key spur lies in our subconscious desire for the self-satisfaction (and subsequent self-assurance of our character) that comes WITH doing good. ultimately, and inevitably, it’s all about us. (i know i sound like ris low here, but in fact she is a perfect analogy for my case: if you strip one of all her secondary intelligences and social awareness [you get a ris low], she would very confidently tell you that ‘it’s all about me’.)

    when it comes right down to it, it is. EVERYTHING we do is about us. and there’s nothing wrong with that. it’s nature; we are built this way. our primal brothers were concerned mainly for survival, and the sense of community came about only when we started establishing relationships and realizing that if another were to be hurt, we will somehow be affected in the long run. SO YES. all about us, and it’s fine. my point for this post is something else about selfishness entirely, but i just had to clarify the above so we can see selfishness as just a fundamental part of ourselves, not to be taken as a negative thing or whatever. what i do want to talk about: the irrational hatred towards another.

    why do we sometimes, for no seeming reason, dislike another? if you assume the above theory that all our reactions are engendered by deep selfishness, it’s illogical that we as humans can hate another who has done almost nothing to threaten our position. it is understandable if you harbour hatred for someone who scribbled saucy untruths about your sex life all over school desks, or another who took your lime popsicle from the canteen uncle and made you cry for one whole traumatic hour (which was what totally happened to me. i still hate her. ANYWAYS.). in other words, DIRECT attacks at your well-being.

    back to those people you just hate for no reason. to properly examine this i shall use an allegory that is common to all girls:

    you hate a ‘slut’. she has done nothing to you. factually, she has not even spoken to you, and neither you to her. you hate her because she plays with boys and boys are enamoured by her. you find her behaviour absolutely disgusting. but why, it has nothing to do with you. you don’t know the boys she constantly leeches on. in entirety, her behaviour has no impact on your life at all.

    this will be your justification: that her skanky behaviour goes against your principles and moral ideals and so it offends you to have even the knowledge of her doing all these stuff. that’s just absolute bullshit. you might also want to be brutally honest with yourself and say it’s because you’re jealous and inherently you would love to be a slutty slut with boys hanging on to your slut self. that is close, but it’s much more than that.

    to reiterate, all of our conscious responses arise from self-serving thoughts. here, it roots from our insecurities. actually, so many disorders have originate from insecurity, but yes. back to the slut allegory.

    here you hate the slut because you are either subconsciously aware that you are lacking (of the slut factor) and aspire to be one, or you see much of yourself in the slut, and it’s something you are not proud of. the slut becomes not simply a person whose actions offend your moral high ground, but is actually either a hugeass representation of your inadequacies, or a hugeass manifestation of the faults you are deadly fearful others might see in you.

    yes. your. own. freaking. inadequacies. and. faults. the hatred is then driven by your insecurities surrounding them. you don’t want anyone to know you’re lacking or flawed, and therefore make a deliberate effort to disassociate yourself from said representation/manifestation. the greatest way you know to distance yourself from it is to hate on it, thus drawing the boldest of all contrast between you and It (it being the slut here la) and making yourself believe you are NOTHING like them (denial). it all arises from a deep seated fear that someone might one day draw a parallel between you and the slut, and realize either that you’re not as good as the slut (and judge you for that) or that you are actually a slut (and judge you for that).

    the greater your insecurity, the more faults and and gaps you notice in yourself, the more you are able to pick out people with similar traits, who become physical demonstrations of these flaws of yours, and the more vastly and intensely you hate.

    so, at the end of the day, it’s not the slut you’re hating. it’s yourself. or at least, what you perceive in yourself as undesirable to society.

    this is the truth, for some people at least. in fact, i catch myself committing this insecure hate thing sometimes. why am i particularly annoyed by whimsical-elusive-butterflies?, i ask myself. do i deep down really want to be a mystery? my blog archive tells me that YES. when i am feeling exceptionally self-pitying i actually do:

    https://dopaminedaze.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/reinventez/

    at the end of the day i realized my mistake and ended with a full embracing of myself like a predictable movie would. really, i’m just too well-adjusted for my own good and can never really be emotionally damaged (even though i damaging another emotionally is very probable). it will happen again, of course, this perpetual cycle of insecurity, denial, projection and hatred, as it will to everyone but it helps if you think more about yourself and why you do certain things though, it really does.

    June 22, 2011

  • Nice Note Guy & Crispy Chicken

    in the library today, the guy beside me wrote me a note.

    as he was leaving, he kind of bent down to pick the note up (??) and placed it on my table and walked away. the note, to summarize, wished me luck for As. he was apparently also from Hwachong (i think he’s a graduate). it was heartening.. VERY, actually; i was dying away inside with every vector i had to intersect, and to have someone tell you he understands how shitty it is and assure you that it’ll turn out fine – it gives you the happy gotong-royong (i got this from SEAHistory HAH.) feel. besides, it’s always nice to have a random stranger show that he or she cares.

    i was revelling in this sporadic act of kindness and it could have ended really nicely BUT this is not Chicken Soup for Your Mugger Soul so unfortunately we didn’t just float away in happy oblivion. he came back after awhile with a friend and sat a little way off, forcing me to contemplate the different approaches i had to take in this inconclusive encounter with Nice Note Guy. there and then i had a mini panic attack. what do i do to maintain this a comfortably distanced interaction with just altruism on his side and gratefulness on mine, without having to go through the cripplingly awkward formalities when stranger meets stranger?

    I KNOW THIS MAKES ME SOUND SOCIALLY INEPT, because the polite thing would be to smile.. or something. (aside: i did a quick psychoanalytical breakdown of my mental disorientation. why the hell am i acting like i’m socially awkward when i am usually not? then i realized, i’m only adept at receiving negative social judgement – wholly due to my tendency to be a total retard in every possible social scene. i’m used to a specific trend of treatment, so when it comes to NICE, NORMAL, FRIENDLY socially things like this, my acutely honed social skills would have prepared me for nilch. in other words, i’m just really good at social damage control [because it is given that i would have done something dumb], but have no idea how to act when someone treats me NOT as a spazz. /end sad revelation of sad spastic self)

    back to the situation of many choices which may or may not ruin this beautiful act of altruism. these were my choices and the projected subsequent consequences:

    a) as i leave, i say to him ‘thanks for the note’. (BUT WHEN DO I SAY IT? LIKE BESIDE HIM? OR WHAT IF HE’S NOT LOOKING AT ME THEN DO I TAP HIS SHOULDERS? I HATE SHOULDER TAPPERS.)

    1. he will remain silent and we will stare at each other in awkward silence as a million gay babies spring forth from a million wombs. he thinks: ‘what a stupid girl. i obviously WROTE you the note because i am consciously avoiding direct verbal interaction right? i shall stare at you in awkward silence until you leave.’

    2. he will turn out to be the pompous type who loves intruding into another’s business. he says: ‘oh GREAT. i have been waiting for you to acknowledge it. tell me what subjects are you taking. you’re taking history? ok what’s your grade. tell me what prajadhipok’s greatest attribution as a nationalist is. pass me one of your history essays and let me critique it because i am pompous and nosey.’ which will be very traumatic for me because i) i suck at history and ii) it would totally ruin the idea of a nice Nice Note Guy.

    3. he says: ‘what note?’ because he totally wasn’t the one who wrote it and just picked it up from the floor for me. (which is highly improbable but since we’re talking possibilities here let’s be thorough.)

    b) as i leave, i smile.

    1. he misinterprets it as a sneer and thinks i’m mocking him.

    2. he does not look at me and i would have to stand there for awhile until he DOES look at me. then i smile. and how retarded would that be?

    3. he is pompous and nosey: ‘oh GREAT. i…’ etc.

    c) i just leave and pretend i didn’t see him.

    1. he thinks: ‘OMG WHAT A UNGRATEFUL ILL-MANNERED BITCH. i will never send nice encouraging notes that are well-intentioned but may perpetuate much psychological turmoil for mentally-unstable receivers, ever again.’

    2. he is a sensitive dude and is deeply disturbed by the etiquette-ly bankrupt state of the society. for nights he will be plagued by my moral decadence and empty consciences of the general people. then he will decide to steel his heart up to level with the equally insensitive masses and become a Mean Note Guy.

    either way i would have built a Frankenstein because of my own social disorder.

    SO, ANYWAYS. just at the moment when i had to make a decision that may or may not determine the social mores of Singapore’s future, something miraculous (for the second time that day) happened.

    while all my crazy conjectures and premonitions were desperately evaluated, the very basal portion of my brain developed a random bubble of thought JUST as i was in the perfect proximity of contact with him. this was the thought: ‘oh my god should i buy crispy chicken for dinner? ’cause i totally want crispy chicken. yes i should, YES I WILL! YES!!! CRISPY CHICKEN!!!’ in the five seconds taken to formulate and excite over this decision, I HAVE ALREADY PASSED NICE NOTE GUY. which means, no action was undertaken – i missed the chance to screw up. so, this being dealt with.. sort of, i went to eat crispy chicken.

    there are three lessons you can take home with you from this:

    firstly, don’t be stupid. just accept the kindness and move on.

    secondly, there are really really truly nice people on this Earth despite them unintentionally leading to my confusing mental breakdown.

    lastly, crispy chicken can always be counted on to entangle yourself from awkward social scenes.

    that is all.

    June 21, 2011

  • society is so very transparent.

    people often are attracted to enigmas. the mysterious, you-know-they-have-some-sort-of-emotional-baggage-but-they-won’t-say-what, you-will-never-truly-understand-them, seemingly complex human types.

    i know this may sound accusatory, but i stand by it: these people – these deep, elusive, silent people – usually just have not much of a personality to present. that or they’re too dense or cowardly to figure themselves out. so why do we as humans find the cryptic qualities of such tragic heroes so appealing?

    it is because we are lesser humans than we believe ourselves to be.

    there are two scenarios.

    1) ‘complex’ and/or ambiguous people are usually indicatively troubled. we are drawn to them because we believe we have the power to protect, help, or reform them – basically to pull them out of whatever deeply emotional turmoil they’re in. the urge to help does not, as much as you wish it to be, spill forth from your compassionate waterfall of a heart. it is more likely to be a manifestation of your own insecurities, and your desperate desire to either prove to yourself you aren’t in such a bad situation (there are others worse off than you, and you have the power to help/protect them) or to image yourself after a kind of saviour-type. both are telling of a deep seated fear that your own failings may surface if you don’t hype on another’s. usually the most unstable of personalities are prone to feel infatuation towards the frail, the troubled, the ‘mystery’.

    2) these ‘enigmas’ leave almost every aspect of their thoughts so vague that it is possible for you to construct, without inhibitions, the ideal self you want him or her to be. in other words, you are exploiting his or her ambiguity of character (what you call, mysteriousness) to romanticize the concept of him/her. it’s a delusional relationship from both sides (he/she’s too preoccupied with not understanding their selves, while you’re just investing your emotions on an illusory ideal.) why the need to create a romanticized object of desire when we can seek a living personality? again, insecurity. an ideal is a piece of fiction, written entirely by yourself, and therefore in your total control. by shifting your affections to an actual character, you will necessarily be subjected to unpredictability, possible blatant rejection, the truth. people fear that. they turn to ‘enigmas’ because nothing will ever be explicit. there is a way to explain the hell out of any nasty situation you may be caught in with these ‘enigmas’. only those with enough self-assurance are ready to take on loving a proper personality.

    okay it’s just a general observation and while may apply to quite a huge number, is not indicative of everyone la.

    an example, then.

    you are reading someone’s livejournal. that someone muses endlessly about how ‘yesterday, it was (an ethereal atmosphere) and all i wanted to do was (insert wistful imagery here), i wonder if (pensive, pensive). sometimes i (unexplained sorrows and regrets).’ you are entranced. it ends with a single line that hints at an acknowledgement towards someone who’s made some sort of dent in his/her life: ‘if you’re reading this…’. you spend an hour dissecting every knowledge you have of yourself and him/her, at last concluding that yes. he or she was talking about you. you are very very happy. OMG!, you think (in a very un-elusivebutterful way), he/she who seems impenetrable in his/her bubble of self-agony and awesomeness actually needs/noticed/depends on/might-even-like me.

    you are a fool.

    the musing comes about when one cannot form proper resolutions from his thoughts. the acknowledgement is probably a reference to his or her pet dog. again, you’re projecting your ideal on this ambiguity. the whole cycle is ridiculously stupid. people need to grow some balls and stop obsessing over these mysterious types. they are just dodgy people who can’t make up their minds and are too pretentious to admit it blatantly. it’s in fact quite sad for them because they’re just lost and helpless people. so yes, people who are irrationally infatuated over frail and mysterious fairies of this motherearth, kindly wake up your idea and quit romanticizing them – you are idolizing an image you’ve created, it’s very sad and soppy and makes me feel very nauseated and disillusioned. is all goodbye.

    i’m very lucky because most people i know are pretty self-assured. or at least enough so to hold their own and not have to hide behind an annoying shroud of elusiveness. people who are well-adjusted, optimistic and open (or are quiet and private, yes also possible) about their lives are often the deepest ones i know. pretentious mysteriousness is pretentious.

    June 19, 2011

  • Everyday I’m Whistlin’.

    so instead of vectors, i’ve been reading.

    and compiling songs with whistling in them. for awhile i’ve realized that songs with whistling (especially those that begin with) mostly turn out to be quite lovely. so i’ve put together a playlist with the nicer whistley songs as far as i can remember.

    i’m quite sure there are more, if you know any cutesy whistling songs please let me know, I’ll add on to this list.

    http://www.youtube.com/p/785C0C40BA06CA4C?hl=en_GB&fs=1

    Nice Songs with Whistling In Them! (So Far.)

    Young Folks – Peter, Bjorn & John

    An obvious choice, but justifiably so. A contemporary mainstream heralding the revival of in-song whistling back from the 60s.

    Home – Edward Sharpe & the Magnetic Zeros

    This is one song that exists for the whistling part, and vice versa.

    Wonderful Place – N*E*R*D

    The Ruling Class – Loose Fur

    I am in love with the riffs, and it’s made all the better with whistling.

    Public Image – Alphabeat

    I’m not very into the song as a whole, but like how it begins.

    Big Noise from Winnetka – Bob Crosby & Orchestra

    The whistling here is just cute, but I’m a huge sucker for old school jazz, and by itself it is awesome. Therefore in the list.

    Daydream – The Lovin’ Spoonful

    Again, old school. I don’t mean to sound pretentious or jaded, but they really, really don’t make music like that anymore. I’m telling you, those from the 60s KNEW how to live. And enjoy themselves while they’re at it.

    Sissyneck – Beck

    One of my favourites.

    Let’s Go Surfing – The Drums

    The perfect feel good for a beach vacation.

    Dark Matter – Andrew Bird

    First Song – Andrew Bird

    Andrew Bird, the master of whistling. He seems to be a reincarnation of his namesake, that or his ancestors had an illustrious career involving birds and passed on their talent of whistling. I think a majority of his songs contain whistling. I like some of his, but not many. These are just a couple of this good ones.

    Pumped Up Kicks – Foster The People

    THIS IS VERY CUTESY. so are the band members, but ah~ THE SONG. THE SONG IS VEH CUTE. I warn y’all first it kinda stays with you for a couple days.

    Feedback in the Fields – Plants & Animals

    I don’t actually know this band very well, but these are one of the very very few songs I’ve heard and liked from them, AND IT HAS WHISTLING. So, my theory. (Really just sing a shitty song and whistle a majority of it and crop out the singing bits and you’ve got a great song). The video is slightly satanic and strange though.

    Two of Us – The Beatles

    Seriously can you expect a compilation of whistles without John Lennon/The Beatles? No. THIS ONE. Is a very lovely song, not difficult, given that The Beatles just produce loveliness in general.

    Morning Broadway – Keith Mansfield

    Sorry I’m just very, very partial to jazz. I don’t even know if this can be classified as jazz, or if that’s really whistling. BUT I LIKE IT SO THERE.

    It’s What You Need – Cloud Cult

    This is really random and short and I’m not very familiar with Cloud Cult. But the whistling riff is pretty sweet.

    Horses – Yes Nice

    Omg another one of my weaknesses – folksy-tribal-nature choruses (read: dirty projectors/fleet foxes/’oh Africa!’). I have this Heidi complex ever since I read it in primary school and have always wanted to run amongst goats (even though they scare me to death) on hilltops with flowers and eat cheese and drink milk everyday in a cottage. This was worsened after I read Life of Pi and became sure I was destined to run wild with Bengal tigers and whatever other nonsense. SO YES this exemplifies my deeply rooted desire to connect with my tribal jungle-girl self.

    Call an Ambulance – Albert Hammond Jr.

    Crash Years – The New Pornographers

    Tourist Trap – Bright Eyes

    Not one of their bests, but Bright Eyes’ good, so I’m keen on having them in the list HOHO Y I SO LIKE THAT. Still pretty, the song is. Late, it is, mad, i am.

    Twenty-two – Wakey! Wakey!

    Provided by Yustynn! I’ve never heard this one by Wakey! Wakey! but I’m glad I did IZ NICE. AND. WHISTLEY.

    28 Agosto – Dente

    Contributed by Amanda! Man I have no idea what it means nor what language it is, but I love it all the same. Sometimes I prefer listening to music in a foreign language, so I can focus on the sound of it, not what it’s trying to say – which sometimes can spoil the song. But right no one really cares so I should just move on. OK MAYBE YOU DO CARE. but i’m damn sleepy wth am i doing?

    A Kiss is Not a Contract – Flight of the Concords

    I randomly realized, just a couple of hours ago, that Kiss has whistling in it. I NEVER NOTICED BUT AM SO GLAD FOR IT. Because a playlist is not complete without a good dosage of FotC. RIGHT and I shall end here.

    Game Called Life – Leftover Cuties

    qt3.141292653589793238. Really.

    Tonight You Belong to Me – The Bird and The Bee

    It’s surprisingly only occurred to me this afternoon that Tonight has whistling bits. After all these years. HAPPY.

    Blue & Gray – Jay May

    Natalee’s brillz suggestion: love. it. this is also the first video i’ve seen on YouTube with 0 dislikes. O-:

    5 Years Time – Noah & The Whales

    Celine’s. i’m running out of things to say about songs cuz THEY ARE ALL REALLY GOOD. this is no exception.

     Bright Stars – Daedelus

    Please please if you have any good song recommendations kindly let me know, contribute to this list of whistling awesomeness!

    3 more to 27! this is excellent proof that there’s an abundance of songs+whistling that are just crazily good. one of my favourite projects of ’11, fo shizz.

    June 15, 2011

Previous Page Next Page

Archive
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • June 2024
  • April 2024
  • July 2023
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • April 2021
  • November 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • February 2019
  • November 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • March 2018
  • November 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • December 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • October 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • July 2007
  • April 2007
  • January 2007
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • March 2006

Blog at WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...
 

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Q
      • Join 115 other subscribers
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • Q
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar